The real rewrite for kiloloop.com
H1 sourced from HN thread · Finding below is free to use, no account required.
Here’s the exact rewrite we did for kiloloop.com. Not a preview. The actual fix — free.
Their hero headline: “Build your own Jarvis on Claude Code.”
That’s a mechanism-first headline — it names the activity (build) and the cultural reference (Jarvis), but the developer outcome (never losing session context) is invisible. A Claude Code user who loses tasks and decisions between sessions can’t evaluate a metaphor. They need to see the specific thing that stops breaking.
One clause fixes it.
Before: “Build your own Jarvis on Claude Code.”
After: “Never lose context between Claude Code sessions — Iantha tracks your tasks, decisions, and on-call notes across every run.”
Same product. The before names the inspiration; the after names what stops breaking. Below is the full rewrite.
This is one fix. Most landing pages have two more like it. Enter your URL below and we find yours — free. The fix is $49 flat.
Audit my site free →Current H1 — what a stranger reads first
“Build your own Jarvis on Claude Code.”
The gap: Mechanism-first — “Build your own Jarvis” names the activity and a cultural reference. The developer outcome (persistent context between Claude Code sessions) and the specific artifacts tracked (tasks, decisions, on-call notes) are invisible above the fold.
Rewritten H1 — paste-ready
“Never lose context between Claude Code sessions — Iantha tracks your tasks, decisions, and on-call notes across every run.”
Names the failure prevented (lost context), the three artifacts tracked (tasks, decisions, on-call notes), and the cadence (every run). Passes the 3-product test — Claude.ai, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot do not persist task threads, decision logs, or on-call notes across sessions in plain markdown git-tracked files. This line only belongs to a product that actually does that.
Rewritten hero subhead — paste-ready
“Iantha runs alongside Claude Code and keeps a persistent log of every task, decision, and note from your session — so when you start Monday's session, your context is already there. No re-explaining, no lost threads, no starting from scratch.”
The dollar logic — why this gap costs you
"Build your own Jarvis on Claude Code." is clever — the Jarvis reference signals ambition and invokes a cultural shorthand for an AI that actually knows your context. But it names a metaphor, not a mechanism, and a buyer can't evaluate a metaphor. A Claude Code user who has lost context mid-week — the task thread that reset, the architectural decisions that have to be re-explained every session, the on-call notes that disappeared — knows exactly what they're trying to solve. They're not looking for "their own Jarvis." They're looking for session continuity. The rewrite names the specific failure prevented (losing context between Claude Code sessions), names the three concrete artifacts tracked (tasks, decisions, on-call notes), and names the cadence that makes the protection real (every run). A developer who ran Claude Code last Tuesday, came back Friday, and had to re-explain the entire codebase context reads the rewrite and understands immediately. "Build your own Jarvis" creates curiosity and requires explanation; the rewrite closes the tab in a single line.
Want this for your site?
This is what Finding #1 looks like. Most landing pages have 2–3 more gaps above the fold costing them visitors every day. The Fix Sprint audits your page, writes the exact rewrites, and delivers implementation steps — paste-ready, 48 hours.
Audit my site free →Free finding first. $49 to fix all three. No account needed.