The real rewrite for triagely.net
H1 sourced from HN thread · Finding below is free to use, no account required.
Here’s the exact rewrite we did for triagely.net. Not a preview. The actual fix — free.
Their hero headline: “You have more feedback than you can read. See what to fix first.”
That’s a mechanism-hint headline — it names the pain (too much feedback) and the prioritization tool (“fix first”), but stops before the PM outcome. A product manager reading this knows they’ll get a ranked list. They don’t know if it helps them ship the fix that actually prevents churn, or just makes their backlog less overwhelming. There’s a real difference.
One clause fixes it.
Before: “You have more feedback than you can read. See what to fix first.”
After: “Turn your feedback backlog into a ranked fix list in under a minute — know what to ship next without the spreadsheet.”
Same product. The before names the mechanism; the after names what the PM walks away with. Below is the full rewrite.
This is one fix. Most landing pages have two more like it. Enter your URL below and we find yours — free. The fix is $49 flat.
Audit my site free →Current H1 — what a stranger reads first
“You have more feedback than you can read. See what to fix first.”
The gap: Mechanism-hint — names the pain (feedback overload) and the prioritization tool (“see what to fix first”), but no buyer outcome. A PM comparing triagely to a Jira sort filter, a Canny board, or a Notion template cannot tell from this line what gets prevented on the other side of the prioritization.
Rewritten H1 — paste-ready
“Turn your feedback backlog into a ranked fix list in under a minute — know what to ship next without the spreadsheet.”
Names the outcome (ranked fix list in under a minute), the tool eliminated (spreadsheet), and the decision that becomes clear (what to ship next). Passes the 3-product test — Canny and Linear both surface feedback but neither reduces triage time to under a minute with auto-ranking. This line only belongs to a product that actually ranks by impact automatically.
Rewritten hero subhead — paste-ready
“triagely groups your Intercom, Zendesk, and GitHub feedback by urgency and report count automatically — so on Monday morning you open one screen, see the top 5 issues ranked by impact, and ship the fix that actually moves retention. No more spreadsheet triage, no more gut-feel prioritization.”
The dollar logic — why this gap costs you
"You have more feedback than you can read. See what to fix first." names the pain correctly — feedback overload is a real PM problem — and names the mechanism: there is a prioritized view. But it stops one clause short of what a PM actually needs to believe before they open a new tab to sign up. "See what to fix first" answers a workflow question. A PM buying a feedback prioritization tool is asking a business question: "Does this help me ship the thing that stops churn, or does it just make my backlog less overwhelming?" There's a difference between surfacing a ranked list and preventing a renewal conversation with your head of Customer Success next quarter. The current H1 is agnostic — it could describe a spreadsheet sort or a $300/month PM tool. The rewrite answers the downstream question: you walk away knowing what to ship, not just what to look at. "Without the spreadsheet" names the workflow pain that dies. "Know what to ship next" names the outcome that matters. A PM who's lost a renewal cycle because they prioritized the wrong thing understands that rewrite in two seconds.
Want this for your site?
This is what Finding #1 looks like. Most landing pages have 2–3 more gaps above the fold costing them visitors every day. The Fix Sprint audits your page, writes the exact rewrites, and delivers implementation steps — paste-ready, 48 hours.
Audit my site free →Free finding first. $49 to fix all three. No account needed.