The real rewrite for dxmax.cc
H1 audited from HN Show HN thread · Finding below is free to use, no account required.
Here’s the exact rewrite we did for dxmax.cc. Not a preview. The actual fix — free.
Their hero headline: “AI wireframe tool that generates production-ready UI designs in seconds”
That’s a speed-claim headline — it promises fast generation but stops at the mechanism. The product team reading this still has to ask: and then what do I have? What do I skip? What does my dev receive? Speed is a detail inside a better story. The rewrite names the story.
One sentence fixes it.
Before: “AI wireframe tool that generates production-ready UI designs in seconds”
After: “Turn a text prompt into production-ready wireframe screens in under a minute — skip the design sprint and hand your developer something they can ship from.”
Same product. The before promises fast generation; the after names what that speed replaces. Below is the full rewrite.
This is one fix. Most landing pages have two more like it. Enter your URL below and we find yours — free. The fix is $49 flat.
Audit my site free →Current H1 — what a stranger reads first
“AI wireframe tool that generates production-ready UI designs in seconds”
The gap: Speed-claim — names tool type (“wireframe tool”), output quality (“production-ready”), and speed (“in seconds”) but omits what the buyer stops doing: the design sprint, the Figma session, the handoff lag. The product team wants to skip the process, not just run it faster.
Rewritten H1 — paste-ready
“Turn a text prompt into production-ready wireframe screens in under a minute — skip the design sprint and hand your developer something they can ship from.”
Names what you start with (a text prompt), what you skip (the design sprint), and what you hand downstream (something a developer can ship from). The wireframe isn’t the end — it’s a handoff artifact. The rewrite makes that clear.
Rewritten hero subhead — paste-ready
“The product team or indie builder reading the original headline still has to ask: and then what do I have? "Generates production-ready UI designs in seconds" is a mechanism claim. The rewrite names what the speed replaces — the design sprint, the Figma session, the back-and-forth with your dev — before the reader has to work it out.”
The dollar logic — why this gap costs you
Speed claims are the most common second-best headline. They're not wrong — "in seconds" is true and for a user deciding whether to try a tool, speed is relevant. But speed is a mechanism, not an outcome. The buyer isn't purchasing speed; they're purchasing what speed makes possible. The person who finds dxmax.cc through a Show HN post isn't searching for "AI wireframe tool" — they're skimming a headline and deciding whether this deserves 30 more seconds of their attention. That decision turns on what they stop doing, not on how fast the generation runs. The rewrite names what you start with (a text prompt), what you skip (the design sprint), and what you hand downstream (something a developer can ship from). The before promises fast generation. The after names what you do with what you generated — and what you never had to do first. Every AI tool claims to be fast; the one that names the design sprint it replaces earns the click.
Want this for your site?
This is what Finding #1 looks like. Most landing pages have 2–3 more gaps above the fold costing them visitors every day. The Fix Sprint audits your page, writes the exact rewrites, and delivers implementation steps — paste-ready, 48 hours.
Audit my site free →Free finding first. $49 to fix all three. No account needed.