The real rewrite for prototyper.co
H1 sourced from HN thread · Finding below is free to use, no account required.
Here’s the exact rewrite we did for prototyper.co. Not a preview. The actual fix — free.
Their hero headline: “Design. Build. Ship.”
That’s a workflow sequence — it names what you do with the product, not what you hold when done. Figma, Framer, and a Notion wireframe all make the same claim.
Before: “Design. Build. Ship.”
After: “Describe the UI — Cursor, Claude Code, or Windsurf builds it live as you type. No static mockup. No Figma handoff.”
This is one fix. Most landing pages have two more like it. The fix is $49 flat.
Audit my site free →Current H1 — what a stranger reads first
“Design. Build. Ship.”
The gap: Mechanism-first workflow sequence — “Design. Build. Ship.” names three steps but not the buyer’s outcome. An AI developer using Cursor or Claude Code needs to know what they hold when done: runnable code their agent can build from, not a static design to hand off and re-explain.
Rewritten H1 — paste-ready
“Describe the UI — Cursor, Claude Code, or Windsurf builds it live as you type. No static mockup. No Figma handoff.”
Names the coding agents by name (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf), the live-generation differentiator, and the two eliminated steps (static mockup, Figma handoff). Passes the 3-product test: Figma = static design artifact; Framer = static-to-deployed but not agent-native; v0 = generated component but browser-only.
Rewritten hero subhead — paste-ready
“Prototyper generates runnable UI from a prompt or screenshot — so your AI coding agent starts from working code, not a PDF to interpret.”
The dollar logic — why this gap costs you
"Design. Build. Ship." names a three-step workflow. It describes what you do with the product — not what you have when you're done. A Cursor or Claude Code developer doesn't open a prototyping tool to "build." They open it to get something their coding agent can work from directly — a runnable component, not a static Figma frame the agent has to interpret. The problem with "Design. Build. Ship." is that Figma says the same thing. So does Framer. So does a Notion page with a wireframe sketch. The actual differentiator for an AI-native prototyping tool is the format of the output: it has to be code the agent can iterate on immediately, not a design artifact the developer has to manually translate. The rewrite names the coding agents by name (Cursor, Claude Code, Windsurf) and eliminates the two steps they replace (static mockup, Figma handoff). A developer who has spent 20 minutes re-describing a Figma frame to Claude reads the rewrite and immediately understands the product.
Want this for your site?
This is what Finding #1 looks like. Most landing pages have 2–3 more gaps above the fold. The Fix Sprint audits your page, writes the exact rewrites, and delivers implementation steps — paste-ready, 48 hours.
Audit my site free →Free finding first. $49 to fix all three. No account needed.